|
|
|
|
|
by anameaname
2942 days ago
|
|
In Item 10 it says: > One study I remember showed that young investors should use 2x leverage in the stock market, because – statistically – even if you get wiped out you’re still likely to earn superior returns over time. And the linked paper says: > The mistake in
translating this theory into practice is that young people invest only a fraction of their
current savings, not their discounted lifetime savings. For someone in their 30's,
investing even 100% of current savings is still likely to be less than 10% of their lifetime
savings This makes a lot of sense to me and says what I haven't been able to about my own risk tolerance. What is OPs counter to this? That the paper's conclusions are flawed, or that no 20-something could execute it? |
|
The difference between a mortgage and margin debt is that mortgages aren't constantly marked to market, and you can continue to own the house even if you're temporarily underwater on the mortgage. Whereas with margin, you can be forced to sell if the value of the assets you've bought underperforms.