| > Your government currently arrests people for criticizing the government online Citation needed - I have _never_ heard of this happening. > covers up child-rape gangs Mostly local government and the police, not central government (who organised an inquiry into it). > mandates whether citizens should receive health care or die For the NHS, _maybe_, and even then it is only limiting care on the very fringes. Nothing is stopping you going private. > regardless of whether they have the money to pay for it in a foreign country I assume you are referring to Ashya King, a child whom was moved from the country against medical advice (which is completely different to _you_ deciding to decline treatment--the decision is being made by the parents on behalf on the child). Furthermore, when the case was decided by the high court, it was ruled that the parents _did_ have the right to pursue that line of treatment: > Having considered the evidence, I concluded that there was no reason to stand in the way of the parents’ proposal. In some cases, this court is faced with a dispute between medical authorities and parents who are insisting on a wholly unreasonable course of treatment, or withholding consent to an essential therapy for their child – for example, a blood transfusion. This is manifestly not such a case. The course of treatment proposed by Mr and Mrs King is entirely reasonable. [...] Both courses are reasonable and it is the parents who bear the heavy responsibility of making the decision. It is no business of this court, or any other public authority, to interfere with their decision. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/judg... I don't see how that supports the notion that the government can mandate your treatment. |
> Citation needed - I have _never_ heard of this happening.
A British teenager was arrested and charged for posting on Facebook that UK soldiers should go to hell.[0]
[0]: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/libertycentral/201...