|
|
|
|
|
by PaulHoule
2943 days ago
|
|
Maybe if I used DDG more I would learn to parse the results better but the first thing I see are many results that have a "dark pattern" appearance to me. Often I do get a good result on the first page but often results #1-#N vary from third rate to non-sequitur and then result #N+1 is the one that should be at #1, where maybe N is drawn from Uniform(3,6). I see this so much I can't imagine it is an accident. If anything it seems to be 70% more evil than Google. |
|