[anarazel]

I don't think that's a claim you can validly make. Perception of how hard it is to get things onto a plane can prevent attacks. And unless you screen everyone's minds, you can't know that that's not the case. I'm not saying the balance is right.

[d0lph]

I wish, the TSA was tested and it failed to stop 95% of instances of undercover Homeland Security agents from bringing on explosives and weapons.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/01/tsa-fails-95-perce...

[anarazel]

That is not a counterpoint in any sort of way to what I was saying. Fear of being controlled could be enough. Thus making the origin point above my post wrong.

[d0lph]

True, I was more ranting, hot topic.

There is a term for what you described, security theater. I'm not saying it's worthless, but it's only not worthless because terrorists might believe it's not.

[lurquer]

To the contrary, the stupidity of the average TSA worker is such that it may encourage bad-actors. Having to deal with such buffoons on every flight make it very difficult to sustain the delusion that gov't security is competent. They'd be better off just having everyone pass before a HAL-esque camera that does nothing but give you the illusion that you are being examined by some incredibly competent agent behind the scenes.