[loewenskind]

what data? One Google query? Again, you seem to not understand how this whole "research" thing works. I really hope you're not a real life reporter because you're either being extremely intellectually lazy with your "argument" or you're trying to be purposely deceptive (again, in an extremely lazy manner). The only real data that's actually been provided shows the exact opposite of your ignorant "decisively rejected" quote.

It's funny when people spend so much effort trying to defend an obviously nonsensical statement. You were wrong. So what? We all say things that turn out to be incorrect, it's no big deal.