If you're working for a company whose business is to transfer massive files, the IT department should be more than willing to pay for CloudBerry. They would need to set up the AWS account and S3 permissions.
It should be a lot easier sell to an IT department an AWS + Cloudberry solution than an unknown company's solution.
My point was that a browser-only solution is more tenable than installing an application in many cases.
I get files from customers in Fortune 100 companies and many of their IT departments absolutely prohibit the installation of something like Cloudberry. It was explained to me that getting IT to approve the installation of a particular application was a multi-month endeavor.
It should be a lot easier sell to an IT department an AWS + Cloudberry solution than an unknown company's solution.