[jbapple]

> Hmm I’m seeing the opposite. The last graph shows Google’s hash table outperforming in all but a few places, including at 400k.

You're exactly right, General Pizza. I was trying to say that the Google table was faster, even though the author claimed that his or her table was "fastest" without qualification.

Thanks for pointing that out; I'll leave my post as it is so yours continues to make sense in context.