|
|
|
|
|
by ethbro
2947 days ago
|
|
The problem with carving out exceptions for small companies is that larger ones would simply subcontract out all their data handling. Like encryption, data privacy is either all or nothing. And personally? I'd rather live in a world without tracking-enabled Google and Facebook business models than the one we're currently in. Holding personally identifiable data is a toxic externality: Experian simply exposed a clear case. If you want to do so, you should have to bear that cost. Or design your business model differently so that you don't. |
|
For example ACA 2012 (Obamacare) applies the most onerous terms on companies greater than 50, but not a lot of 100 person companies split into two groups of 50 to dodge it.
I think privacy is indeed along a spectrum and not binary. I certainly think that EU citizens are more concerned with Facebook and the vast trove of data they have and political irresponsibility with it than with GarethsFirstApp in the Android store handling user data well.