[lukeqsee]

I like the idea. The execution is suspect.

The site seems cluttered. The mixture of typefaces, italics, and colors grate against everything I've come to love about minimal sites.

If this is what is ahead for the minimal web, count me out.

[Mini-WWW]

Thank you, Lukeqsee! The execution is just in early ALPHA stage. I even run it on a cheapest shared web account (more powerful dedicated server and search soft are to be in October only). As for what minimal page is, I would tell you I've seen a LOT of websites that call themselves Galleries (Top Lists, or whatever) for MINIMAL Webpages, where only few of their links point to really minimal ones. No matter what the name for the Minimal pages could be, I see them as SMALL and FAST ONLY!

[lukeqsee]

If that "Thank you" was sincere: you're welcome. If it's not, sorry, I'm only trying to help.

My definition of a minimal webpage: a design that doesn't get in the way of it's content.

Unfortunately your current font-* styles get in the way of your content.

It's that simple.

It doesn't matter what web server you use, or how you define a minimal page. If I can't read your content, I'm not going to take stock in what it's trying to present.

[Mini-WWW]

My "Thank you" was sincere! I launched the Mini-WWW Search Engine because I SIMPLY COULD NOT READ many beautiful websites their developers still very proud of. So, that's my first criteria for the Ideal Minimal Webpage, - the one that it's EASY FOR DOWNLOADING!!! I'm also sorry that you don't like my current fonts and styles (in fact, the only serious drawback about them I know is that fonts are with fixed size). Tastes differ, and although I accept my pages may not be excellent, they are very good in emphasizing idea of SIMPLICITY! More important, - they LOAD FAST!