[zimbatm]

The argument on both sides is around financial burden:

* Pay more for delivery because not using Amazon Prime

* Pay more to buy an Android phone

When making this argument it's obvious that buying a new phone is much more expensive than Amazon Prime but this raises an interesting question; what is the financial threshold at which point one has to be considered a monopoly?

[_Mazza_]

Most people shop on multiple websites, most people don't carry around two phones.

[shawnz]

Most people also don't pay for a subscription service that gives you cheaper prices. If you look specifically at Prime subscribers, I bet you'd find that they make efforts to do all their shopping through Amazon where possible.

[zimbatm]

In this context, the Phone is supposed to be on the same network for latency reasons. Having multiple phones at home is not a big issue.