Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ballenf 2942 days ago
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that it's cheaper to take one or the other, but if you mostly take credit cards then there is a marginal cost to also accepting cash? And vice versa. However:

- If I'm doing a large cash business then the next $5+ costs me basically nothing.

- However if I'm doing a mostly credit card business, the next $5 will cost me the same as the first $5.

With that, I think the analysis you read was funded by payment processors.

1 comments

It's a good mind trick to look on a single additional transaction. But you are also not thinking about all the costs you have per month for storing, securing, exchanging cash.

But to correct myself: This 5€ break even is on a macroeconomic level on all parties. Cash is more expensive on this level when you spend more than 5€ on a single transaction.

Just one example of the other party: the end consumer also cannot get cash for free (even when he get's it free from the ATM, there are costs the bank has and maybe you pay them indirectly).