|
|
|
|
|
|
by oblib
2952 days ago
|
|
|
I think it's a cool idea. Here are a few thoughts: I think it might work better in urban areas if you stuck to food/wine/microbrewery and art/museum/theater and city park type experiences. If you're going to do sports events, go as a spectator. I think you limit your audience if you focus too much on the outdoorsy/physical stuff. I think (at least initially) you should keep it to one adventure, as opposed to a choice of two and I think you might want to consider limiting it to twice a month until you have enough people attending to justify more than that. I think you should try to offer a similar experience in each of your locations and a way for those who attended to share their experiences online so can learn about those other locations. A FB page could be used for that. I think you should offer an option to pay per adventure. |
|
|
I think, based on other feedback we received, at least a subset of our target audience (recent graduates who are too busy to plan stuff) wants a way to be able to stay healthy without the boredom that comes with going to the gym.
I think the near-term plan is to give users the option to pick their desired intensity level. My personal bias also leans towards doing more intense activities, and I'd like the service to be one that I'd use.
The choice of two adventures is to prevent the "what if I don't like that week's adventure" argument. Currently, if too few people sign up for an adventure, we pad the rest of the group with personal friends :)
Almost every person we talked to gave us the feedback that they want to see the experiences of others. Will be adding that shortly.
The option to pay for a single adventure is a good idea.
Thanks again!