[maoistinquisitr]

Your comparison illustrates my point. Oklahoma is not crisscrossed with efficient water transport and reliable annual fresh water. Oklahoma is probably overpopulated as it is.

The Netherlands is, too, in the long run. But for now it's economically sustainable.

[vinceguidry]

Water transport is comparatively cheap. Urban areas throughout American history have been able to reliably source enough water for their needs. It gets difficult in deserts, but the US was blessed with many, many rivers and abundant rainfall, it's a crucial reason why we rose to prominence in the first place.

There are a few interesting studies in this area, California's agricultural section's tug-of-war with its residents for water is the biggest one that comes to mind, and the lesson you get is that industry uses up the lion's share of the water out of greed and sloth, but enough pressure will force them to curtail usage.

[cascom]

The state has does have pretty significant water transport (look up the port of Muskogee and Catoosa), not to mention a great deal of rail and pipeline as well, no idea about the aquifers etc.

I wouldn’t want to live there, but seems like a lot of bulk commodities, and products come in and out of Oklahoma and there is still plenty of room...

[maoistinquisitr]

> US is one of the least densely populated developed countries

None of the other developed countries have vast interior deserts. The east and west coasts and some parts of the Mississippi and Great Lakes watersheds are plenty overpopulated.

[greedo]

This is typical "flyover state" bull. The Midwest has tons of water, tons of space, easy travel, great amenities, and a business friendly environment. Colleges are affordable, housing is affordable, and crime is relatively low. But the in crowd has decided that the East and West coast are all that exists, and that everything else is a "vast interior desert."

[perl4ever]

Other than Australia...