|
|
|
|
|
by sametmax
2953 days ago
|
|
Yes, and JS was not the center of it at all. Support was inconsistent, it was slow, leaked memory... Actually, most actors tried to find a way to replace JS with something in house (ActionScript, ActiveX, Java applets) so they could dominate the market. |
|
Netscape and later Mozilla were also heavily investing in JavaScript long before Google came on the scene.