| > Yeah, the burden is on the buyer not to purchase stolen goods. 1 party has 100% of the information, 1 party has 0% of the information, and the burden is on the party with 0% information. That's absurd. > The manufacturer is certainly under no obligation to support them. Not support and bricking are two different things. > In many states even unknowing possession of stolen goods is a crime Generally the state has to prove the defendant took receipt of the items for an unlawful purpose. Ohio is an exception, but I'm not sure if there is another one. > so many of the "users" here are in fact getting off lightly. You use "many" incorrectly here: Very, very few are. Because very, very few jurisdictions make it a crime to unknowingly receive stolen property and even fewer would actually press charges even if allowed. Your post is nonsense. |
The manufacturer can definitely brick, or do whatever they want. The devices are still their rightful property, this isn't a gray area, they were stolen, no one has rightful claim to them except the owner, who was the manufacturer.