|
|
|
|
|
|
by fspeech
2953 days ago
|
|
|
I added a note in my original comment to emphasize that I was responding to the specific argument by the parent comment. On the factual basis the ban is reinstituted not for the reason you stated that "they were deliberately planning to continue selling them". That was part of the case the led to the original fine. The reimposition of the ban is on a more technical ground. |
|
|