[nemothekid]

As I dive deeper and deeper into this thread, it looks like people are confusing "verbosity" with "it-has-a-type-system".

Java (5,6) wasn't verbose just because of types. Java was verbose because the language, and everything surrounding it was verbose. It was difficult to read Java at times because the language had been gunked up with AbstractFactorySingletonBeans. FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition is a joke that is only funny and simultaneously dreadful in the Java world. However, despite being relatively more complex, Rust is far less verbose than Java- even though Rust is more powerful with regards to types. "Hello World" in rust is 3 lines with just 3 keywords. The Java version has 12 keywords.

Engineers ten years ago weren't choosing Ruby/Python over Java because of static typing. They didn't choose Java because it was relative nightmare to read and write.

[erik_seaberg]

Lambdas saved the language. Java 6 was the kingdom of nouns. You couldn't pass statements or expressions, so instead you had to create classes that happen to contain what you really wanted. Async code was nearly unreadable because the code that matters is spread out and buried.

[ethbro]

This was said in other threads under the article, but we've definitely made huge strides in more efficient typing.

The general narrative of "early Java typing hurt development productivity" to "high throughput developers (e.g. web) jumped ship to untyped languages" to "ballooning untyped legacy codebases necessitated typing" to "we're trying to do typing more intelligently this go around" seems to track with my experience.

Generics, lamdas, duck typing, and border typing through contracts / APIs / interfaces being available in all popular languages drastically changes the typing experience.

As came up in another comment, I believe the greatest pusher of untyped languages was the crusty ex-government project engineer teaching a UML-modeling course at University.

To which students, rightly, asked "Why?" And were told, wrongly, "Because this is the Way Things Are Done." (And to which the brightest replied, "Oh? Challenge accepted.")

[neves]

I really think what saved Java is the really good tooling. These nice modern IDEs almost program for you.

[pjmlp]

10 years ago I was writing Java and still am today, alongside other languages.

I will never chose Python/Ruby for anything else other than portable shell scripts.

[ageofwant]

15 years ago I wrote Python code for a living. Then about 9 years of Java. The last four years was exclusively Python. I'm never going back to Java, it has nothing I want.

[ivanhjc]

What's your job while using Python?

[orf]

Each to his own I guess.

[steveklabnik]

(There’s only one keyword in Rust’s hello world, “fn”.)

[vesak]

And I think 3 in Java's? public, class and static.

[majewsky]

Does "void" count?

[vesak]

That seems to be a keyword, yes. So 4.