|
|
|
|
|
by miduil
2965 days ago
|
|
Well it depends, does your Linux account running Firefox has the possibility to access root (sudo, su)? If yes, I don't know. Maybe a 'strong' apparmor/selinux policy might capture some exploits, firejail tries to mitigate? Other yes, clearly: A Firefox exploit would usually not result in root access (unless it's combined with other Linux exploits) - in the case of firejail, it would have resulted in a root exploit. I'm not saying: Don't use firejail at any cost. But I'm trying to say that you shouldn't have a false confidence in your security, just because you are using firejail and this because their current practices doesn't seem ideal for a security product. At the moment firejail advocates sound like that firejail is 'a proper security solution for Linux desktop', but given the circumstances, it's not. might be worth checking out tor-browser-(bundle?) apparmor profile/s |
|