Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by iodiniemetra 2955 days ago
Not hyperbole, a real problem that leads to interop issues. For example, the hellish filesystem wars of the mid 2000s.

Most distros STILL ship ext4 despite there being better options.

3 comments

Hellish? I was running linux back then (since 97 actually) and while there was a fair amount of confusion, it wasn't due to the many choices we had, and there was nothing hellish about it. The confusion was because we hadn't realized that the right way to handle file system issues is to keep backups and have automated rebuilds. In some tiny minority of cases you also need some flavor of RAID. Other than that, why worry about file systems?
With respect you missed my point

Why should your interop concerns influence choices I need to make for my project?

Shared utilitarian solutions to basic human problems like food, healthcare, shelter, Linux kernel I get

Why do I need to adopt anyone else’s “code slang” for my otherwise specific needs? If ext4 works who are you to tell me to use something you think is “better”?

What general purpose FS would be a better standard?