|
|
|
|
|
by noir-york
2955 days ago
|
|
Polanyi as a thinker isn't frankly particularly imaginative or interesting: for someone who read British economic history, it appears he missed Adam Smith's Moral Sentiments, political liberalism, and the rise of a parliamentary labour movement in England (as opposed to a revolutionary party). If Polanyi had considered the above he wouldn't have come to the conclusion that the two possibilities are either socialism or fascism. The prescriptions - social welfare, etc - at the end of the article are known. The question is why they haven't been implemented in the US (they have in most other Western counties to various degrees). I address other points in another comment below. |
|