[scrumption]

then another question: why even bother building in a hard drive large enough to store hundreds of documents? certainly a circular buffer 1/1000th the capacity would be cheaper?

this makes no sense no matter how many one line hand-waves you make

[jlgaddis]

1. Cost. It is (presumably) much cheaper to use the same COTS SATA HDDs that are used in desktop PCs.

2. Since now your copier/printer/scanner/fax/coffee machine has a 500 GB in it, what are other ways we can take advantage of that space? Save a copy of every printed document ("for compliance"), e-mail documents straight to the end user, dump scanned documents (PDFs) straight into a network share (or run such a share on the device itself), cost accounting (by user or department or ...), "hold" printed documents in the queue until the user actually shows up at the printer to retrieve their print job (they can quickly/easily "release" it -- prevents other users from inadvertantly seeing documents they shouldn't), and ...

---

Off-topic edit: Right after I wrote this comment, I remembered how years ago it was possible to "bounce" TCP connections off of HP JetDirect devices. I had a cow-orker that was overly paranoid and always had a terminal window open tailing the logs on his workstation. The look on his face and his bewilderment as be watched his PC slowly being port scanned by a 10-year-old printer in a building 60 miles away (but still within our network) was absolutely hilarious.

[palisade]

Yea. Overly paranoid. You guys were surely messing with him all the time. The paranoia was probably justified.

Edit: At one of my jobs I had a coworker that put a program he wrote himself on my computer that slowly ate up cpu cycles until the machine seized up and froze. I always carefully locked my machine and out of "paranoia" I had usb autoplay disabled. That was long before this became standard practice in the workplace. He got it onto my computer remotely by exploiting a zero day flaw he had read about in the vmware driver at the time. Which I was using to get actual work done while he was sitting idly by. He thought it was hilarious. I was let go about a month later when I completed all of my tasks ahead of the delivery date. He ended up getting promoted to a senior position by accomplishing nothing and playing pranks.

At another job, some coworkers impersonated my boss by signing up for a google account with his real name and using that to register to the internal business chat system which apparently allowed that. And, then used it to yell at me with profanity that I wasn't working hard. It led to me writing a polite email to my actual boss stating that I was working hard and the profanity wasn't professional or appreciated. I ended up getting terminated over it. They're still there.

[DoofusOfDeath]

> I had a cow-orker that

I'm sorry if my English isn't that great, but what does it mean to "ork"?

[jlgaddis]

cow orker: n. alternatively: cow-orker

[Usenet] n. fortuitous typo for co-worker, widely used in Usenet, with perhaps a hint that orking cows is illegal. This term was popularized by Scott Adams (the creator of Dilbert) but seems to have originated earlier in a 1997 ScaryDevilMonastery.

-- http://wiki.c2.com/?CowOrker

[Rychard]

I'm fairly certain they meant "co-worker"

[patrickg_zill]

Some copiers have "mailbox" functionality - I can send a document to "Mailbox 57" via fax or scanning or other method; and then someone from the department that Mailbox 57 references can walk up, type in their PIN code, and get all the documents in their mailbox printed out.

They can usually choose to store the documents unless their allocated space is full; sometimes after 15 or 30 days the old documents are deleted. Of course, if you just unplugged a system and got rid of it, the "delete after 30 days" code would never be run.

[tomatotomato37]

Storage density has gone up so much that its cheaper to get a consumer drive with ~100GB than a specialty drive with 5GB. Even then a full harddrive seems excessive.

I have the feeling that these aren't true harddrives and more likely some type of flash memory. The flaw is that the copiers are probably programmed to managed the memory like a massive ring buffer in order to make things like managing page order easier.

[marcosdumay]

Because it's a Linux machine like the one you have at home, because it's cheaper to use off the shelf everything, including the OS configuration.

[tzahola]

1. Because building from commodity hardware is faster and cheaper.

2. It's not hand-waving, that's how file systems work.