Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dnomad 2961 days ago
The US federal government and its partner banks would not be interested in a currency they did not absolutely control. Superpowers are simply not in the business of giving up power and it's not clear that the surrender of such power would lead to a stable system.

The entities that could reap enormous benefits from cryptocurrencies are precisely those entities which today for various reasons have tax power but do not have currency power. But tax power is currency power. This means those states with truly dynamic (high tax, high growth) economies -- California, Massachusetts, New York -- could issue transferable tax credits [1] which would be, fundamentally, money. There would be widespread and deep demand for such credits. The problem is that today the trading, control and verification of such credits is very difficult and costly [2][3]. A distributed public ledger could dramatically decrease the trading and operational costs.

Monetizing state credits with a block chain could reap enormous efficiencies. The immediate big win would be in welfare. Today California has extraordinarily vast, complicated, and inefficient welfare system [4]. All of this could be replaced with a highly efficient system where credit-money is issued directly to those who most need it. There's a lot of literature that such direct cash grants are the most efficient mechanism to fight poverty and this is why modern welfare is so inefficient [5]. Imagine the effect of a system where the hundreds of billions of California welfare money could be efficiently and securely distributed directly to those who truly need it with the press of a button with zero cost. The recipients of these credits wouldn't have to wait until one magical date nor would they have to file complicated returns to claim and monetize these credits they could go out and spend them immediately.

Note that here the advantages of a distributed public ledger would work particularly well for California Credits. The transparency of the scheme means it is always immediately clear how many credits are outstanding and who owns them. There would never be any doubt about whether a credit is transferable or valid. The big problem with tax credits -- fraud[6] and "double spends" [7] -- would be eliminated over night. A distributed public ledger for all this public money would allow true, real-time public accountability.

[1] http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stat...

[2] http://www.hmblaw.com/media/97814/the_transferability_and_mo...

[3] https://www.bna.com/incentives-watch-monetizing-b17179870903...

[4] https://www.quora.com/Does-California-really-have-30-of-the-...

[5] https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/most-welfare-dollars-do...

[6] https://www.nevadabusiness.com/2016/12/transferable-tax-cred...

[7] https://www.bna.com/incentives-watch-transferable-b579820651...