|
|
|
|
|
by shwin
2962 days ago
|
|
My partner is studying the effects of cow grazing on various greenhouse gas things, and the amount of data you need to get/the number of times you need to replicate before policy makers are willing to step in, is really quite substantial. I showed this article to her last year when it popped up, and she said "show me a large sample size and replicate it stateside and then I'll start caring." harsh, but I think that's where we are with this kind of thing. |
|
In the lab? On "bacteria found in the stomach of cows"?
That's a long way off from what the title suggests; this research is definitely still valuable, but I think we do scientific reporting a disservice when we make much bolder claims than the actual science bears out.
Lab studies != actual cows eating stuff