> Corruption isn't the only logical conclusion. It's foolish to pretend otherwise.
Instead of blindly speculating on what could be true, when you've already said that you're not familiar with the topic, how about doing your research on the facts and learning why this is what's actually true.
You started off with a claim that was directly debunked by actually reading the article. Then you pivoted to speculating (but not substantiating) the existence of information that could hypothetically make your original statement a little less incorrect.
At this point, the only foolish thing is pretending that you're contributing to the discussion in any meaningful way.
Instead of blindly speculating on what could be true, when you've already said that you're not familiar with the topic, how about doing your research on the facts and learning why this is what's actually true.
You started off with a claim that was directly debunked by actually reading the article. Then you pivoted to speculating (but not substantiating) the existence of information that could hypothetically make your original statement a little less incorrect.
At this point, the only foolish thing is pretending that you're contributing to the discussion in any meaningful way.