[ocdtrekkie]

My impression is Google's lawyers are not dumb enough to let Google publicly announce they're illegally recording calls in a two-party consent state: Presumably their demos were recorded with permission or staged.

But I was definitely curious how they could operate Duplex without running afoul of existing laws. It's possible Google believes they are not "recording" the call when they send audio to and from their AI.

They may be transcribing calls to text, which arguably isn't "call recording", it is just writing down verbatim what was said in the call. They likely have enough voice data from other sources, like Google Assistant on people's phones and Google Home that they can avoid recording calls explicitly.

[patmcc]

>>Google publicly announce they're illegally recording calls in a two-party consent state

Why wouldn't they just run these tests in a one-party consent jurisdiction? From a quick google only 12 states are two-party. Nothing about the demo indicated to me it was done in California.

[ocdtrekkie]

Also a possibility. Google can provide one-party consent since Google is initiating the call.

[chintanb]

I agree that they might be "writing down" the call. Is it legal ? or We accidentally signed up for this when we are using android phones

[astro_robot]

I believe OP is asking about the training model data for Google Duplex (i.e. did Google record calls between two people for training data).

[seba_dos1]

I don't think that's actually your phone doing the call.

[ocdtrekkie]

No, but the issue is, in many places it would be illegal for Google to record a call where they called someone else.