Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by CyberDildonics 2964 days ago
If there is a modern C++ compiler available for a platform, it is almost irresponsible to use straight C. That doesn't mean that everything needs to be pure idiomatic C++17, but destructors, templates, iteration, operator overloading and move semantics are still indispensable in non trivial programs.

Avoiding bloat and performance hits are trivial in comparison to structural and architectural benefits in the modern language.
1 comments
zwieback 2964 days ago
You're overstating a bit but there's a kernel of truth. However, it depends on your viewpoint. If you have a functional codebase in C and size is an important factor you may be reluctant to trade up. Bloat avoidance is not trivial, in my opinion. Performance is probably less of a factor, most of the additional functionality generated by the C++ compiler has to be written by the C coder in the end.
link
CyberDildonics 2964 days ago
> If you have a functional codebase in C

Rewriting something that already works would be silly of course.

> and size is an important factor you may be reluctant to trade up. Bloat avoidance is not trivial, in my opinion

I don't agree with this in comparison to C. C is still there, but you have destructors and ownership semantics on top of it. Even templates can be used for things like type checking in debug builds.

link