Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nyanotech 2969 days ago
> It's the lack of a universal API.

This sort of thing is exactly why the healthcare industry still uses faxes, even going electronic charts -> pdf -> fax -> pdf -> electronic charts in some cases.

2 comments

This is even more fun because in the modern age, what very often ends up happening is:

electronic charts -> pdf -> fax -> fax machine as a service -> unsecured email -> pdf -> electronic charts

Compliance can sometimes help, but ultimately the data needs to flow, and people will do whatever it takes to make that happen. Until security is so easy that it's the default, these little loopholes will continue to be abused.

Phaxio co-founder here. We do a _ton_ of heathcare faxing and we're starting to see a shift away from the "unsecure email" in applications. Granted, we can't see what our users are doing at all times but being HIPAA compliant ourselves, we often work with our users to understand their systems and guide them towards compliance.

>> Until security is so easy that it's the default, these little loopholes will continue to be abused.

The simple way to think about this is that the government is more worried about unsecure email/email spoofing than it is about wiretapping.

To be fair, you’ll notice if 150 million faxes start going off rather than someone breaking abusing your API.
Healthcare uses faxes mostly because HIPAA rules particular to format and security of electronic communications don't apply to faxes; it's a compliance hack.
That sounds a bit too juicy to be true. Any citations?
I've literally been in the room when legal and compliance offices gave the advice on both the construction of the relevant regulations and industry practices on which a payer relied on in deciding to use a process that created paper documents then faxed them for certain purposes, but, no, there's nothing published I can link to as to that being the reason industry players make that decision.

I can, however, point you to the relevant section of HIPAA regulations on which it rests, the definition of “electronic media” at 45 CFR § 160.103, specifically this bit: “Certain transmissions, including of paper, via facsimile, and of voice, via telephone, are not considered to be transmissions via electronic media if the information being exchanged did not exist in electronic form immediately before the transmission.”

And in a way it is justified, you need a warrant to wiretap a phone line but no such constraint on eavesdropping on TCP/IP communication.
> if the information being exchanged did not exist in electronic form immediately before the transmission

So you need to print them out before faxing? PDF->Fax wouldn't work with that definition.