| > Hey, I bet you've heard of this, it sounds like Riff is absolutely in the same space :D I have, and I admire a lot of the work Deis folk have been doing at Microsoft. I have different opinions about the future looks, but I could be wrong. And I'm not the only member of the riff team. In terms of "scale to zero" for workers, I think your "two whys" need is containers on-demand, not workers on-demand. That need is going to be met by the various virtual kubelet efforts underway. Azure have been out front on this, actually, with AWS Fargate coming hot on their heels. I expect that as GKE matures it will hit this too. As we move towards "five whys", it turns out that we are essentially re-treading the path that Cloud Foundry got to years ago (and Heroku before that): focus on making it easy to run code. Containers are in themselves an almost-irrelevant implementation detail 99% of devs should never have to care about, just in the same way that most of us don't think about mallocs any more. I call this the Onsi Haiku Test, after the `cf push` haiku that Onsi Fakhouri gave at a conference a few years back: Here is my source code.
Run it on the cloud for me.
I do not care how.
And coming into riff from the Cloud Foundry universe, one of my personal agenda items is that riff should pass the Onsi Haiku Test with flying colours. |
I'd really like to get you in the room with a couple of architects and technology leadership in my office. (No seriously, maybe zoom room.)
I'm on the kubernetes train, but they are mostly still hoping on Fargate, having never made this leap, and I have this feeling that I never would have got into the k8s world without the kind of help I got from Deis.
> Containers are in themselves an almost-irrelevant implementation detail 99% of devs should never have to care about
Couldn't agree more. Deis made this easy for me before it was on Kubernetes (CoreOS and Fleet), and when I was finally convinced to leave that stack behind, Deis made it easy for me again to do the same on Kubernetes. I'm the biggest fan of Deis anywhere.
(I've felt the loss of the Deis Workflow maintainers so badly that I'm personally working on the team to fork Deis! But the bus factor is way too high for my place of work, which is a university; they want something they can understand and that they can support or pay a vendor to support if I am not around anymore. That won't stop me, but it also means I need to keep an ear to the ground for something we can use to start doing CI/CD here.)
The technical leaders in my place of work, have already made the leap to AWS, but are just testing the waters of eg. spot market and serverless (lambda) to try to get the cost and reliability benefits to start to materialize, and they would really like to skip containers altogether and start building everything for Lambda. I know enough to say "whoa there Icarus that's no way to reach Lift-and-Shift" and pretty sure from my experience you should start lower (but still with some higher abstraction than plain old Docker containers, and also not Compose or Fargate.)
So I'm in a pickle because Deis is no longer offering support for end users, otherwise that's probably what I'd still be recommending.
I've been looking at possible replacements like Cloud Foundry (and Convox, and Empire) but your haiku hits me right in the feels and is the really important message I need to deliver. I am developing an application right now and I need the kind of devops machinery and support that is appropriate for that kind of effort in 2018
(and I definitely don't want to be embroiled in exploratory project to implement containers for the whole organization some time in the next 5 years, at least not before we can get something out the door for our customers across campus...)
I just don't think we do enough software development to justify spending on something like PCF but I'm not the one who would need to be convinced, either!