Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hb3b 2963 days ago
Unfortunately, Airbnb is probably the only way a middle-class family can earn money on investment properties. No one in their right mind would rent a $1,000,000 condo for (1% rule) $10,000.
5 comments

If you have a million dollar condo in addition to your primary residence then you aren't middle class by any common sense definition of the word middle.
What is the 1% rule? As a landlord I usually assume 0.5% per year.

So a million dollar condo would be 50K a year, or about $4200/mo, which is exactly in line with current nyc rents.

The rule is a residential rental is only worth the risk or has a good return if the property can be rented at about 1% of the value per month or more (e.g. a $100k home should rent for $1k/mo). I generally try to get an annual cap rate of 9% or more (1%/mo less expenses).
Wow. That rule must only apply in smaller cities. I can't think of a single residential property in the Bay Area that would even come close to that.

On the other hand, all the properties I manage do 0.5% per year and have all been profitable, not even including the appreciation on the property.

Not smaller, just different areas. It's fairly easy to achieve that in the Midwest and larger urban areas in the southeast. I typically got ~0.8%/mo or more.

I'd go so far as to say that if single family residential is your strategy it's better to take the multi-million dollar investment in a single home in the Bay and make one in 5-7 (or more) homes elsewhere. The appreciation is drastically lower but the cap rates are amazing (much higher cash flow) and the risk is spread out. Of course, with that kind of investment it's better to go multi-family or commercial anyway.

Are you referring to NYC in general? Because certainly it's possible to earn money (or at least increase equity) with investment properties.
The 1% rule applies to cashflow investors, NYC is basically at the complete other end of the spectrum and this rule makes no sense there.
what about REITs?