|
|
|
|
|
by jlees
5755 days ago
|
|
Well, the basic economics of giving away too many coupons is definitely the core of the problem, but it looks like Groupon aggravated it somewhat. By taking a high cut and targeting discount-minded (rather than repeat-custom-minded) clientele, the $8000 basically went down the drain, and the business experienced more headaches dealing with testy Grouponers than they would normal clients. Part of this is a learning experience about what you offer as a discount, how you offer it, and who you target. Instead of offering half-price cookies, offer half-price vegan cookies or similar. Do a smaller test first (though maybe Groupon doesn't allow that?) so you can get an idea of repeat rates and discount-hungry one-off customers. The word of mouth gained from this one campaign may well echo forward for months to come, but it's still sad to see a business struggling when a site like Groupon is supposed to be fantastic for both parties involved in the transaction. |
|
This is what confuses me. Shouldn't the split have been determined before the contract was signed? I don't understand how they could have made a deal with Groupon, but not worked out who would keep what percentage.