|
|
|
|
|
|
by DINKDINK
2969 days ago
|
|
|
>Nothing's going to be perfect, but the outlook is a bit more positive than presented in your example. Ideally what would happen is that the doctor would use their judgement to narrow down the candidates who the test is applied to who have strong priors of Autism. That would substantively increase PPV. You'd need a ~50% prevalence before you get to 95% PPV |
|
|