[rhapsodic]

>If somebody finds any of the below to be objectionable and refuses to abide by it, I would not be comfortable attending a conference with that person or being forced to interact them for e.g. code review purposes.

Not me. I would perfectly comfortable interacting with such a person, because I'm a mature, professional adult who is not a fragile child that needs to be treated like a kindergartner. I will go out of my to not work with the adult babies who think the world should revolve around them, and have to politicize every aspect of life.

This part is meaningless:

> Posting sexually explicit or violent material.

because virtually everyone would agree that's not appropriate. You don't need a CoC for that. The entire purpose of these CoC's is to get people to do this:

> Be careful in the words that you choose

IOW, say something we don't like, and you're gone.

[hojjat12000]

> I will go out of my to not work with the adult babies who think the world should revolve around them, and have to politicize every aspect of life.

Not me. I would be perfectly comfortable interacting with such a person because I'm a mature, professional adult who is not a fragile child that needs to be treated like a kindergartner!

[BillyWM]

>because virtually everyone would agree that [sexually explicit material] is not appropriate.

Virtually everyone, except the hordes that thought "DongML" was a laugh riot, of course.

https://web.archive.org/web/20130117043748/http://sheddingbi...

The Libertarian ideal that "people would police themselves equitably if you just leave them alone" is flat out wrong.