strictnein's comment was blanket statement, and not limited to GDPR.
More specifically, tuke pointed out the territorial scope of GDPR, and strictnein's response seemed to argue that the underlying premise should be invalid.
My comment was to point to a counter-example that is already widely supported.
More specifically, tuke pointed out the territorial scope of GDPR, and strictnein's response seemed to argue that the underlying premise should be invalid.
My comment was to point to a counter-example that is already widely supported.