Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cornholio 2976 days ago
Copyright violation is not a criminal action unless done in an organised, for profit fashion as piracy. The fundamental piece of evidence the prosecution needed for that was the trumped up and bogus damages value Microsoft supplied.

Hence, the title and article are correct.

2 comments

If you read some of his emails in the case it is very clear that it was done in an organized, for profit fashion.

https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2018/04/27/the-fac...

He profited. Microsoft's losses are irrelevant.
The sentence is based on the (purported) losses to Microsoft. Exhibit 17:

https://blogs.microsoft.com/uploads/prod/sites/5/2018/04/2LU...