| > Laws like GDPR are written in such away that make them open to "legal trolls" Except with GDPR all you could do is report them to the member states governing body. So no trolling. > Very Specific and not open to interpenetration Except this makes them inflexible and leads to them having to be constantly redrafted. So no use to the world of the HN. > Have options for "settlement" as this rewards the guilty, and harms the innocent GDPR is between you and the regulator, they already do this work and the whole aim of the process is to stop you doing bad things. A fine is a late step in the process for organisations who wont listen. > Have more public resources for people with limited resources. Law firms and Large corporations use Legal Expenses has a weapon in Civil Courts over smaller companies due to the high costs and generally no public resources for Civil access Is off topic when it comes to GDPR, see my previous answers > All Civil Cases must have to show Actual Damages not Theoretical Damages Again off topic with GDPR, but in the UK that is how damages works already, isn't it? |