Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by martinald 2972 days ago
The EU did a lot of analysis about this between member states.

It concluded that markets with 4 or more providers were far better served (price, quality, coverage, etc) than those with 3 (which effectively is what the US will have now).

The UK blocked the merger of 3 and O2 on these grounds, as it would leave only 3 providers.

3 comments

Does sprint even count as a provider? The size of the players must matter? If you have 4 players and 3 are there in name only, surely that can't still be true?
From the looks of it, Sprint will be bankrupt in a few years anyway, and then we'll still end up with 3 providers, but likely Verizon and AT&T (in addition to T-Mobile) will buy up parts of its carcass. I'd rather T-Mo gets it all, now, rather than have all three companies fight over the scraps, later.
Do you have some source for the EU analysis would love to read this in depth? Googling doesn't turn up anything related.
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-16-1705_en.htm is a starting point, but I can't find the EUs own source.