|
|
|
|
|
by jasode
2978 days ago
|
|
>To me, it's downright scary that someone would want Google telling them what is important in their own mailbox. You probably have a much lower volume of email than the suffering email users who want AI algorithms to help them manage their inbox. The analogy would be something like "Pagerank". You can't lecture a web surfer that he shouldn't leave the importance of web pages to an algorithm like Pagerank. Instead, he should read the 1 billion pages himself to determine which is most important to his search query. There are not 1 billion emails in an inbox but any number of messages greater than a few hundred is the equivalent in information unmanageability. It's an inescapable math problem. If you only have ~16 waking hours a day, you may only be able to realistically dedicate ~4 hours to reading and responding to emails. Your allocation of that finite time is a zero-sum game. The math problem: the outside world can stuff more unimportant emails in your inbox than you have the human capability to read and curate. Therefore you must have a robot "reader" assist you. |
|