|
|
|
|
|
by chenster
2978 days ago
|
|
@google, check this: https://dribbble.com/shots/4020485-Inbox-Client/attachments/.... It's better than yours. Never a fan of material design.. seriously, Google is NOT good at design. Period. I hoped, in this Gmail iteration, Google would finally take the plunge and kill the flat icons and minimalist design and once for all. It's quite the opposite unfortunately. It got flatter and uglier. All so plain and washed out, one doesn't know what he should look at first. |
|
Why designers don't use background to highlight active items, while keeping text/icons high contrast, instead of making everything unreadable, and using black color to barely highlight what's focussed, is beyond me.
It's all extremely gimicky, especially all those useless animations of huge areas of the page.
I never understood what it's for, aside from commenting on screens - and it does shitty job at that too - you start typing a comment but you can't move the fucking comment box around so that it doesn't cover the part you're commenting - so you close the comment box, to see and reopen and your unfinished comment is gone. Instead of focussing on important stuff like this, they create shitty gimmicks.
It's almost satirical how it markets itself compared to how bad it is.
And whatever this is it certainly seems inspired by InVision.