|
|
|
|
|
by cschwarm
2972 days ago
|
|
Indeed! However, we do not know how long biochar lasts when used as a soil amendment [eg. 1]. Also, it's only useful in this way when loaded and applied to poor soil in the tropics [2]. For long term storage of CO2, it might be better to just bury the main products of pyrolysis (biochar and pyrolysis oil) where hard coal and the oil once used to be - deep in the earth. Burying both products should also make it cheaper (from a carbon mitigation point of view), since it's hard to make useful products from the pyrolysis oil. The biochar also doesn't need to be as clean as when used for soil. One can even pyrolyse old tires (and possibly plastic). The problem is, of course, that there are no long-term studies about the stability of biochar (and the bio-oil) in deep layers. [1] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcbb.12266
[2] http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa67bd/m... |
|
The best way to implement this is by slash-and-char of the tropical forests. I have done the calculations and using less than 30% of te tropical forests we can pull out all the CO2 being addded from human activity. It would also create a viable industry in some of the most poor regions in the world.