|
|
|
|
|
by repsilat
2973 days ago
|
|
Right -- the control flow allowed is basically the simplest thing that will allow you to make a C-like language in a relatively efficient way. It isn't aimed at any particular compiler, it's aimed at supporting some semantics. Providing additional flexibility on top of those semantics is "expensive" in terms of implementor-time and effort to get safety, portability and future-proofing. There's no promise that the fun extensions they might want today go "in the right direction", and the cost of going down a bad path is high for standards. |
|