|
|
|
|
|
|
by AnimalMuppet
2981 days ago
|
|
|
Well... the article didn't say what the line width, say, actually is. It just said that the process is labeled 7nm, which doesn't necessarily correspond to any features actually being 7nm in size. It just means it's that much smaller than the previous process. Don't get me wrong, it's still amazing, and the line widths are still going to be much less than 193 nm. I just wish they'd say what some standard feature size actually is. |
|
|