|
|
|
|
|
by jacobwal
2982 days ago
|
|
Does anyone have the bull case counter to this? Similar to aresant I don't mean to belittle WeWork's achievement but these facts, alongside the headlines from CEO claiming that: "Our valuation and size today are much more based on our energy and spirituality than it is on a multiple of revenue."[0] it's easy to be skeptical. Again - would be great to hear the optimist's take on this, if anyone has it. 0: https://www.axios.com/wework-ceo-valuation-based-on-energy-a... |
|
The bulk of executive compensation is in either outright equity ownership, or increasing bonuses based on equity price increases. Equity can be viewed as a call option on the enterprise value of the firm [1].
If you own a call option, you can increase its value by either making it 1) more in the money (by directly increasing the enterprise value, i.e. by generating value 'the honest way') or 2) increasing volatility directly, either by taking real economic risks (investing in more assets) or utilizing leverage (debt). Here we see both.
Note that financial investors in a company can be perfectly OK with results that boost the bottom line today, but lead to disaster down the road, so long as they're convinced there will be a short-term boost in the share price (at which point they exit and sell to the next sucker).
[1] https://www.fields.utoronto.ca/programs/scientific/09-10/fin...