|
|
|
|
|
by pjmlp
2980 days ago
|
|
Licensing is quite cheap compared to other commercial products in the same league. I find it quite acceptable. - Willing to give your work for free the same way as taking Qt's work? No problem, LGPL has you covered. - No issues with dynamic linking, still wanting to use the work of others for free? No problem, LGPL has you covered. - What to sell it for lots of cash? Then give the Qt guys a piece of the cake back and be happy they still exist. I wonder what are the nice parts of JS web dev, collecting new frameworks and build tools every week, or functions as packages? In fact I am pretty opinionated that some of the new UI goodies are only exposed via QML, which wouldn't be a problem if people stopped writing logic there. |
|