|
|
|
|
|
by chiefalchemist
2984 days ago
|
|
What I was trying to communicate is that Science makes mistakes. Such is life. However, Science makes no effort to own those mistakes. If your sig other __from your pov__ constantly "deceives" you, what happens? Science is oblivious to the __cumulative__ effect its process has on belief, trust, etc. The irony of this truth baffles me. |
|
That sounds ludicrous to me. The entirely of the scientific method is about generating hypotheses, testing them out, finding out you're wrong, and then refining/rewriting those hypotheses and trying again, ad infinitum. Plenty of scientists have been 'wrong' for years.
I'd argue the problem you're trying to highlight isn't about 'Science' per se, but the fact that people/the masses/etc like to have just one immutable 'answer' for something. They find it difficult to cope when new results point to different answers. Is that really the fault of 'Science'?