|
|
|
|
|
by wolfmuffin
2975 days ago
|
|
Regarding the OP. Distributed systems can have much, much higher performance than centralized ones. BitTorrent is a good example: on a torrent with thousands of peers, it will literally eat up as much upstream and downstream bandwidth as you throw at it. If you had a big enough torrent it could take on a botnet for lunch. More computers. More processing power. More bandwidth and storage. You just need to organize it effectively. The reason Bitcoin and such are so slow is not because they're distributed systems. It's because transactions are propagated throughout the network in a flood fill, and there's a proof of work for each one. Bitcoin is inherently slow because of its design. It's a first-generation product. There are serious academic efforts to build blockchains that can rival credit card processors in performance:
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/australian-scientist-have... There are a lot of problems with these efforts, but there's the possibility they'll work them out. I don't think blockchain is revolutionary or fundamentally new technology. But it's launching distributed systems into the public space and that can only be a good thing. |
|