|
|
|
|
|
by pbhjpbhj
2986 days ago
|
|
Digital files can be duplicated, hashed, have redundancy logically built in. Analogue files render incorrectly too; surfaces deteriorate - media rots, oxidises, decays. I've got digital files from last millennium that have survived better than analogue ones - both written text and images. For the most important I've kept logical and physical redundancy (but not yet needed it); much harder to do with bulky physical media. Libraries in my UK city, and across the UK, have been closed rapidly in the last few years - the materials are generally dumped/sold, but the data from all of them could be held in a small box (computer) with multiple redundant backups for the cost of a couple of magazine subscriptions. For one librarians wage this could all be easily shared with the entire web. We, or at least I, am keen to hang on to some artefacts. But a lot of what we keep seems to be primarily useful for navel gazing. |
|