Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nurettin 2985 days ago
Too bad for arch https://www.archlinux.org/news/switching-to-xz-compression-f...
3 comments

Is this really an issue for this use case? My naive take is that since Arch updates packages so often, "long-term storage" doesn't come up that much in practice.
It's zero issue since the packages are updated regularly and hashed before installing.
Good point, I hadn't even thought of checksums!
Default compression for debian packages is xz as well: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/en/man1/dpkg-deb....
this is from 2010, I guess if xz was bad for this use case they'd know by now