[wyldfire]

I suppose that comment is to indicate exactly what's been linked to and not to indicate an impressive feat.

So, yes, you are likely both in agreement.

Instead of what content often shows up on HN with lots of technical detail, this amounts to a service announcement.

This service sounds interesting but a much better HN submission would be one that talks about how it works, how it was improved, etc. Browsing the phish.ai website uncovers several (very brief) articles that are more interesting than this repo.

BTW footnote wrt the API's design -- {"verdict": "clean"} -- this is not ideal for a non-interactive service. It should either return a numeral (like a confidence interval) or a boolean value.

[yevpats]

Hey, Thanks for the feedback. It's a great idea and I got the same feedback from more people so we will publish a blog on how it works - I replied with a short explanation to encoderer. footnote on API design noted and will be added:) thx