|
|
|
|
|
|
by codedokode
2986 days ago
|
|
|
Telegram has no authority to ban anything so it cannot be at fault. Trying to make your service work cannot be called "malicious activity". > That should bother Google and Amazon, who should guarantee the connectivity of their law-abiding customers by kicking out Telegram so the IP range bans are lifted. This might increase an influx of complaints from other governments. If they kicked out Telegram, why not kick out someone else? |
|
|
Telegram knew the Russian government was trying to censor them. So they disguised their traffic as Google traffic. Now, because Telegram did this and Russia called their bluff, some Google clients who have nothing to do with Telegram can no longer reach the Russian market.
Why isn't this just as malicious as any other denial of service attack? It sucks for Telegram, but it's not reasonable or sustainable to let anyone who needs to evade censorship impersonate Google.