|
|
|
|
|
by jandrese
2983 days ago
|
|
Typically they are equipped with either a Continental O-300 series engine from the 40s, or a more modern Lycoming O-320/360 from the 50s. They hark back to an era of magnetos and manually adjusting the fuel mixture. On the plus side they're so mechanically and electrically simple that there's very little to break. On the downside they're pretty inefficient and carburetor icing is still an issue. Also, they need leaded gas still. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_O-300 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycoming_O-320 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycoming_O-360 I'm not kidding about the efficiency either. The Lycosaur O-360 is a 5.9L engine that produces at best 225hp. You can get 245hp out of a 2L Ecoboost in an economy car today. This isn't an apples-to-apples comparison, but it gives you a sense of how far engines have come since the 50s. A Cessna 172 retrofitted with a modern engine could probably get more than a 50% increase in range, and also cabin heat. |
|
[1] https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2015/february/p...